Characterization of Twelve Angry Men
Juror eight spends a majority of the play defending the child prosecuted. This could be because he understands the life that this boy has endured since it was pretty crappy and he expresses his understanding so much that perhaps his life as child was not ideal either. It's as if he feels guilty for the boy's awful hand he was dealt because he says that "we owe him a few words". It could be read as guilt or even connection. Juror eight even goes as far as questioning the defense attorney and how little he did to defend the boy convicted. He pays attention to all of the details and the evidence very closely, just like an architect would do when constructing a building. He goes into detail about how the neighbor supposedly heard the murder say he was going to kill the victim was odd and did not really seem very likely. Details are important to this man because it is in his job description to be aware.
Comments
Post a Comment